3分pk10- - (中国)百科词条

来源：3分pk101803-10-30 17:48

3分pk10

电影《讲究人》预告片首发二手玫瑰梁龙爆笑上演东北讲究人******

　　由刘作涛执导、吕仲男编剧，二手玫瑰主唱梁龙领衔主演，丁溪鹤、李庆、张舒淼、曹汉超主演的东北喜剧电影《讲究人》正式定档12月18日于腾讯视频、爱奇艺笑闹上线。《讲究人》以东北小城为故事背景，讲述了张大讲究平凡而又不平常的生活叙记，通过小人物视角展现了东北人对讲究的独特理解，处处充满人间烟火气。该影片由西安凯斯影视传媒有限公司、北京金涛星辰影业有限公司出品。

电影《讲究人》预告片首发二手玫瑰梁龙爆笑上演东北讲究人

　　梁龙上演讲究专业户，呈现小人物多种切面

　　今日，在影片《讲究人》首发预告中，从天涯歌舞厅走出的“摇滚教母”梁龙一口熟悉的东北话——“今天是个好日子，吉祥的事儿都能成”，瞬间将人带入东北浓厚的欢乐氛围里，其饰演的通北第一大炮子—张大讲究更可谓是人如其名，把“讲究”两个字360度全方位贯彻落实，集东北人经典特质于一身，开口便是梗，令人不禁捧腹大笑。

电影《讲究人》预告片首发二手玫瑰梁龙爆笑上演东北讲究人

　　论张大讲究到底有多讲究？观众们或许可以从预告中窥见该角色的几个高光切面，首先是兄弟情之间的讲究，还处于年轻气盛时期的张大讲究带领好兄弟们上演了一场东北冰雪版雄霸风云，当三人对战众多对手时，他展现了“你们先走，我断后”为兄弟两肋插刀不惜牺牲自我的江湖精神。当多年后大讲究再次面对昔日旧敌时，亦或可以为了兄弟，二话不说直接以酒瓶子砸头的直球方式向对方道歉低头。大讲究视兄弟为家人，遇见事儿不怕事儿，能伸能屈，只为求得他们平安，这兄弟情之间的讲究令人动容。

电影《讲究人》预告片首发二手玫瑰梁龙爆笑上演东北讲究人

　　俗话说“一方水土养一方人”，预告片中不论是秧歌队明丽的色调还是有趣的台词，都营造出了一种别具一格的东北人专属气质和轻松幽默的氛围感，从视听双重感受展现了东北人的搞笑讲究。生活中，大讲究和媳妇儿的对话如同情景喜剧般笑点密集；工作中，大讲究和饭馆老板的对话也令人啼笑皆非，但东北人的搞笑讲究就是如此让人畅快而轻松，好感倍增。

　　讲究的内核始终如一，梁龙于角色中释放本色

　　在大讲究的人生轨迹里，讲究贯穿了他的一生，这种讲究不仅具有丰富的精神内核，还形成了一套独有的生活准则讲究之道。其中不乏有大讲究执着于重开天涯歌舞厅为老年人献爱，用自己的方式温暖他们，对人对事皆真诚以待，大讲究在某种程度上是让人安心的一种存在。

电影《讲究人》预告片首发二手玫瑰梁龙爆笑上演东北讲究人

　　影片中饰演大讲究的梁龙，相信大家都并不陌生，身为中国著名摇滚乐队二手玫瑰的主唱，是摇滚教母也是美妆博主，近期一直活跃在各大音乐综艺，且多次跨界出演电影角色。时至今日，梁龙的名字仍持续跳动于不同领域，他的更多真实面逐渐被更多人熟知。同样身为东北人的梁龙，在工作和生活中也自有一套讲究的行事风格，包括对音乐的讲究、对艺术的讲究、对美妆的讲究、对电影的讲究……与片中角色张大讲究简直如出一辙，这一角色更像是他的本色出演。

　　电影《讲究人》围绕张大讲究一角，以他为轴心，画出了人生并不完美的圆，有欢笑也有苦恼，有困难也有挑战。但就是这样一个个东北小城中的小人物，他们努力生活着，奔走在属于自己的一方土地，或许各人各有不同的“讲究”，但这才组成了充满人间烟火气的生活。

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.